I’m Hank Mortar, and I’m a University-educated redneck. I’m the perfect person to write this post. Almost all date-rape is consensual at the time it occurs. I mean, if a female voluntarily allows herself privacy with a male she isn’t related to, she already gave consent. Otherwise, what is the purpose for the privacy in the first place?
There are those who claim a woman must give explicit, affirmative, verbal consent. But then shouldn’t we go straight for the 19-page consent form in triplicate? That level of consent places almost every act of fornication squarely on the criminal side of the law. It’s insanity! No girl wants to give explicit consent, but she wants the man to perform mating behavior on her.
If the guy later dumps her, then it becomes rape in the mind of the woman. It’s all a matter of self-esteem. If the girl gave herself to the guy, and then he dumped her, she’s worthless. Whether or not a rape is a rape depends on how the woman feels about the guy. If a girl doesn’t want an aggressive guy, she should avoid privacy with males she is not related to! It’s really just that simple. So, the female bears some of the blame for being raped, because she failed to prevent it.
Let’s define rape. Rape is sexual assault between strangers. If the girl willingly enters into a near-mating situation:
Follows a man into his bedroom
Takes off her top in front of the man
Dresses immodestly
Allows the man to grope and fondle her
Entices the man by her wiles
Or does anything besides pull a gun on every man who comes within 50 feet of her, it isn’t rape!
That’s just as absurd as the explicit verbal consent rule. On the one hand, no act can be considered rape. On the other, every act can be considered rape!
On the one hand the judge says, “After the victim became intoxicated, then entered the defendant’s bedroom and removed every stitch of her clothing, did she actually say anything to the effect of, and addressing the man by name, so he knows that she is giving verbal consent to him and not some other guy she mistook him for, ‘Bradly, you have my explicit verbal consent to place your penis into my vagina, and to deposit your masculine issue into my uterus, at the opening to my Fallopian tubes?’
“OR, perhaps she merely said, ‘I can’t wait to have you inside me!’ In the latter case a crime has clearly been committed, since the meaning of the consent is ambiguous, and she could have meant it in a purely emotional sense. In the former instance, the woman is specific. She uses correct anatomical terminology, and there can be no mistake as to her intention.
“In light of the fact that government is infested with satanic feminism, it is the expectation that men be jailed for masculinity except in the presence of totally unnatural verbal consent given by the female. Let’s just get this over with. No woman would ever lie about being raped. Take the guy straight to the penitentiary, and leave him there until he rots!
What are some ways a girl can prevent being raped?
Get married and get pregnant! No woman with a diamond on her finger was ever raped in front of her two small children as they all loaded groceries into her minivan!
Avoid beverage alcohol. Beverage alcohol causes foolish errors in judgment that many times lead to catastrophic consequences!
Avoid going out at night without a male chaperon.
Avoid privacy with men the girl is not related to.
Avoid immodest dress.
Avoid vanity.
Avoid french kissing.
But you say, “No guy has proposed! How am I supposed to get married?”
I respond, “If the girl exclusively dates one male before he has proposed, she gives up all her leverage! He’ll never propose if he can have her all to himself. And even in the event he does propose, an engagement diamond is not a prostitute’s wage. Intimate contact is forbidden outside the bonds of Sacramental Matrimony!
California governor, Jerry Brown, who might still be married to former pop-star, Linda Ronstadt, recently signed a bill into law that criminalizes nearly every act of fornication! Hooray Jerry! People should not have intimate contact outside the bonds of Sacramental Matrimony.
California now requires women to give explicit, verbal consent—no innuendos or euphemisms permitted! For instance, if a female is in bed naked with a guy, and she says, “I want you to lube and fill me,” and the guy takes that as a ‘yes’ to intimate relations, it could later be construed as rape! She has to say something like, “I consent to your penis being put inside my reproductive tract.”
There’s a number of ways she could give consent, but the mystique surrounding intimate relations is now an artifact. Governor, Jerry Brown, wants every female to bear the full weight of guilt for every intimate act outside the bonds of Sacramental Matrimony!
The woman must also be in clear state of mind—under the maximum alcohol level to operate a motor vehicle, and no drugs—or else, any explicit, verbal consent she gave at the time of the act is irrelevant at any subsequent time! Whether an intimate act is consensual in California depends on the woman’s emotional whim at any later time!
The University of Virginia student known as, Jackie, claims to be the victim of a gang-rape involving seven male students from a certain fraternity on campus. Rolling Stone magazine—that pop-culture icon—was in full support of Jackie’s rights as a rape victim! But they didn’t stop to ask, “Did the rape actually occur?”
The alleged victim made several outrageous claims: she left the frat house in bloody clothes, the result of cuts gotten from a glass-top party table that was broken during the ordeal. Let me make note that the local police are silent on this crime?!
There is not one shred of evidence linking the alleged perpetrators to the victim. She claims she attended a frat party, at a certain frat house, on a certain date. But there was no party that night. She claimed the rape was part of a hazing ritual for initiate frat members, but none of the frats on the University of Virginia campus accept new members during the period of the year the rape supposedly occurred!
She named several males, but the details she supplied were all incorrect. None of the accused could even be placed in the frat house at the alleged date and time. The girl embellished her story with incorrect details such as, one of victims was a lifeguard at a certain swimming pool, and that she had seen him working there.
He is a lifeguard, but he never worked at the place she stated she saw him working as a lifeguard. Rolling Stone magazine has now admitted that the girl cannot be trusted. In fact, she might have made everything up! Not even a shred of her story can be substantiated by evidence other than her testimony; testimony that changes during each interview!
Even her friends on campus are surprised! She claims to have been out with a friend from chemistry class. All likely candidates were interviewed, but no one from her class was with her that night! The campus victim-advocates are still supporting Jackie 100%! WHY? How could this be? Simple, it doesn’t matter to victim-advocates if a crime was committed or not, or if the victim is actually a victim, because there are so many women who actually are victims who are not heard!
Even if a rape accusation is clearly false, it’s symbolic value to all victims, everywhere, is too great to toss away just because it’s made up. If victim-advocates adopt that stance, the first question everyone else will ask is, “Did the rape occur?”
I do not understand why some women get up in arms over questioning whether or not a rape actually occurred. If a rape occurs the woman will know it immediately. She won’t figure it out days or weeks after the fact. One of the essential elements in an accusation of rape is that the woman noticed right away, while the event took place!
Campus officials claim that something happened to Jackie. That could be anything. But I can guess that the rape probably occurred, and it probably occurred the way Jackie said it did. WHAAAAAT? You heard me.
I took this one to God Almighty. He explained to me that Jackie is from a small town. She’s naturally trusting. She had just moved to an unfamiliar area—a much larger city—and she was unfamiliar with it. Her orientation may have been off. She made many errors in her testimony.
Perhaps she was just guessing at which frat house she was rape in. They all kind of look the same at first. Maybe she shut her emotions down during the event, and her memory of it was unclear. But, given the evidence of her testimony, there should be a full investigation.
Jackie should be advised that she must be sure of the facts before she states them as fact. I think she’s a desperate girl grasping at the few straws she has, in the hopes of preventing similar acts against other girls.
She’s was obviously quite naive. The seven men deserved serious prison time. I’m convinced an atrocious act occurred, and an innocent girl was utterly abused and victimized. But that doesn’t mean every other rape accusation is legitimate. I believe the members of the frat in question are lying through their teeth, and that Rolling Stone editors were influenced by someone quite powerful, to make them drop the story.
But more woman lie about being raped than all people combined lie about being victims of all other crimes combined! So, of all possible accusations, rape accusations are the most unreliable. Before any action is taken on a mere accusation, it must be established that there actually was no implicit consent given!
Some people—especially on drugs or drunk—remember experiences in a vastly different way than others who observed the same events. Jackie may have emotional problems stemming from the event. This could cloud her memory.
Between 2% and 8% of rape reports are false. That’s of the incidents in which the D.A. indicts on formal charges, and only those that can be conclusively proved false! Between 95% and 98% of all rape allegations are not even investigated by law enforcement, because during initial questioning the alleged victim admits—in some way—that the act was consensual.
How could a victim do that? A girl cries rape to police. The police investigator makes note of the date on which the alleged act occurred. Then, (s)he asks, “When was the last time you and so-and-so went out together?”
If she was still dating the guy after he supposedly raped her the claim is weak! Rape must be of a quality that the girl would stop dating the guy who raped her. If she continued to date him after he raped her, it isn’t rape! Has satanism flipped the world upside-down?
The following actually happened. A girl got so drunk at a party that she couldn’t operate an elevator. She knocked on some stranger’s door at midnight, in the same apartment building. A young, attractive, single male lived there.
The man answered the door and she invited herself in. She lead him by the hand into his bedroom, stripped off her clothes and laid naked on his bed while saying,
“Do I turn you on?”
Well, she didn’t give explicit, affirmative, verbal consent. But she did give consent. If the guy starts dating the girl, a week later it will still be a consensual act that occurred. If the guy dumps her right away, the act will become nonconsensual after butt-ugly-dike feminists and sodomites get a hold of the girl and convince her that the male must be punished for being the architect of oppression, abuse, rape; and being a dirty, filthy pig!
Over 80% of High-School students do not make the connection between rape and forcing a girl to have sex! So, the innocent girl thinks it’s permissible for guys to force girls to have sex. It’s only after sensual guilt builds inside the female that she considers rape accusations a legitimate means to exact vengeance.
Guys are Created to pursue, subdue and mate the female. It’s not rocket surgery! It’s common sense! If a girl dresses slutty and provokes males to mate her, that’s what she wants! Otherwise, what is the purpose of emphasizing by dress or demeanor, the girl’s suitability to mating?
Physical attraction is a genetically programmed mating trait designed to draw people into intimate relationship, to procreate the human species! Attraction, courtship and marriage are for one purpose: reproduction. Use of the reproductive system is for reproduction!
It’s more than a little bit repulsive that some people simply want to glut themselves on the pleasure to be had through mechanical stimulation of the genitals; either by a woman’s flesh orifices, or doing it themselves.
The Catholic Church is clear: Any activity that removes from the man’s reproductive climax the promise of new life is forbidden. It’s interesting to note that in cases where government policy or court verdicts conflict with Roman Catholic Doctrine, the government is always wrong. Truth does not change.
So, a girl goes out and gets lit up on liquor. She eagerly embraces the loss of her choicest ornament. But a week later she laments the passing of her most valuable possession. And she didn’t get the guy! In fact, he was out with some other girl, I mean, 2 other girls at the same time. He didn’t even remember her.
Negative attention from the guy who popped your cherry is better than no attention at all. Hence, the rape accusation. At least it wasn’t her fault! It was his fault! At least if there’s a charge levied against that filthy beast, the girl will have proof to offer future prospective bridegrooms that it wasn’t her fault she lost her virginity.
Then she won’t feel bad on her wedding day. The bride and groom bring their most valuable possessions to give to each other as wedding gifts. The bridegroom gives to his bride his name, so that the offspring she bears for him shall be called blessed.
The bride gives to her bridegroom her intact hymen. Unless she doesn’t have one, in which case she better be able to prove it wasn’t her fault.
The other thing is, setting a standard of explicit, affirmative, verbal consent makes nearly every out-of-wedlock intimate act a crime. But that’s good! If fornication presents an unacceptable risk to the male, he’ll marry the girl. Once a girl is married, it’s easy to become a mother, because that’s what girl’s want.
If the guy keeps her busy, by the time his wife’s sensual guilt rears its ugly head, she’ll be tied down by seven kids—totally dependent on the man. That’s makes for a great world.
Someone asked me, “I suppose you think women should get pregnant!”
I said, “Two words, ‘Me, and God’.” Then I pulled out my pocket knife and said, “I can save guys like you from Hell! Drop you drawers!”
He called 911. The cops came over and I just said, “No good intention goes unpunished! I was trying to do the guy a favor! Sheesh! If he keeps sticking that thing inside other guys, he is going to burn for all eternity! I was just making an offer. I wasn’t going to force it on him.”
The Sheriff’s Deputy said, “I see where you’re coming from, but not everyone is like you and Bubba. They don’t understand kindness the way you do. So, I’m writing a citation for misdemeanor assault. I’m stipulating that if you show up in court the whole thing should be dropped. Just be a little more careful from now on.”
“Thank ya there Sheriff.”
We’re seeing a renewal of Christian values through laws enacted by godless perverts, liberals, and butt-ugly dikes! All things work together for the greater Glory of God. Sodomite marriage will be a boon for the Roman Catholic Church!
No parent wants their kids attending class with children who have 2 mommies or 2 daddies. That leaves the Catholic Church to pick up the slack! Catholic schools can reject, and essentially must reject, students who are living with homosexuals!
It’s predictable that most public-school parents will shift over to Catholic Schools, restoring the Church’s role in the upbringing of children. Not that there’s anything wrong with gays. But there’s a cure. I read it. I forgot where, but there’s a link on google.com.
Do you think maybe it’s time to add google.com to the spellcheck. It’s only the second most common word, right after the!
If you’re a female who suffered a legitimate rape, this next part is for you. Sex should not be terrifying. It’s wrong what happened to you. But it’s like a child out in the forest, at night. Are you going to blame the wolf for eating the little girl.
Something that always works against rapists is a tablespoon. Not some wimpy tablespoon—a quality tablespoon. But you have to practice with it. You hold it in your right hand between your thumb and two fingers—upright—with the scoop toward you. The cops aren’t going to bust you for carrying a concealed spoon!
People are at complete liberty to carry spoons. But if you give it a quick flick of the wrist, as if at someone’s forehead, minimal force will fracture the attackers skull. He won’t be prepared, because you’re brandishing a spoon. It gives you that fraction of a second to escape.
I’m serious! Try it on yourself very gently. Now imagine someone else getting hit with that at fifty-times the impact force. For practice, fill a stocking with some pillow filling, Dacron or something, about the size of a head.
Tie it from a string to the ceiling. Start it swinging, and practice whacking it with a spoon, with flick of the wrist. It’s difficult at first, but Rome wasn’t built in a day. It’s surprising that abducted female after abducted female has reported releasing repeated, full-force hand-blows to male assailants without effect.
You really need something easy, quick, and natural. The flick of the wrist is a very natural motion that packs a lot of power. Let the spoon do the work. If you flick it too hard, you’ll miss.
For the emotional damage done by intimate violation, receive a Sacramental confession, confess your sins, but include the sin of being raped. I know it seems outrageous, but women feel a lot better afterward.
In ancient times, if a man forced a girl to have relations, the girl expected a baby for herself. If she didn’t get pregnant, the magistrate ordered the guy to go back, and make sure the woman got pregnant!
Nowadays, rape is no big deal, because the victims are neither virgins nor married. Unmarried females who have already had some other guy inside themselves don’t need to fear guys forcing them to have sex. If it happens the girl doesn’t lose anything, and her body probably responded to the man! So, she wanted it!
Far from being adverse, pregnancy resulting from rape benefits the woman, because she gets new life in her own image without the obligatory subjugation to masculine authority from God Almighty. There are going to be a generation of childless old bags who would give anything to go back and get pregnant.
If you ask them, “What if you got pregnant by a guy forcing you?” They’d say, “You know those voices you don’t hear? Those belong to the children I never bore. That’s what I will hear on my deathbed—silence so thick you can slice it!
“Who cares whether or not it’s by force. At least it’s fun for both! If a girl is attractive enough that a man can’t help himself but to have her, she should accept it as a compliment! But if she gets forced and doesn’t get pregnant, she definitely has a legal right to insist that the man come back until he successfully sires offspring for her.”
Many females lie about being raped. In the eyes of the law, consent does not change. The law uses objective criteria based on sound reason.
- Did the woman resist the alleged attacker?
- Did she cry out for help?
- Did she report the incident immediately after it happened or at the first possible opportunity?
- Did she date the guy after the alleged incident occurred?
- Did she repeatedly attempt phone or text communication with the guy after the alleged rape?
- Did she voluntarily allow herself privacy with the guy?
- Is she known to have intimate relations outside the bonds of Sacramental Matrimony?
- Was she dressed immodestly?
- Is she divorced?
- Is she past age 22, unmarried and childless?
- Did her body respond to the man?
All of these things are of interest to the court, because they help to determine whether or not a crime was committed.
Many women have lost their bridal adornment outside the bonds of Sacramental Matrimony. Many have not mated one male exclusively. Many have been divorced of their own free will. The reason for the sharp increase in rape incidents is the looser definitions of criteria for rape.
By any rational analysis the number of rapes has decreased, because rape is unnecessary. In the Third Millennium the women are so desperate that they are willing to:
- Date exclusively without receiving a marriage proposal.
- Initiate communication with males.
- Allow intimate contact outside the bonds of Sacramental Matrimony.
- Enter drinking establishments while they are yet maidens.
- Allow themselves privacy with males they are not related to.
- Dress in outrageously scandalous ways.
- Wear heels that thrust the female body into a mating posture: breasts heaved and buttocks tipped up.
- Have more than one living mate.
- Divorce their husbands.
All that adds up to the best time in history to be male. Women are so easy it’s pathetic. It’s like they think they have to do it in order to compete. When you can get females in a state that drives them to sleep with guys in order to compete with other girls, heaven has come to earth for males.
The guy says, “If you won’t, there’s another girl who will. I’ll just drop you off and pick her up. I know she loves me! I’m not so sure about you.”
So, guys never need to commit to anything. They can get a girl on birth control, move in together, and the guy can do whatever he wants all the time! The girl is always ready whenever he comes home, to give him anything he wants. In return for doing all the housework, she gets half the bills. But now she’s got three years tied up with this guy!
She talks about security and commitment. He says, “I really love you. I just don’t want to get married right now. Could you please respect that?” Then he sates himself on her flesh, again. After five years, she comes home from work and finds he’s moved his stuff out. He never returns.
He meets another 19-year-old virgin. But this time he is ready for commitment. He places her needs for security and commitment above his own base drive, elevating her personhood above his passion, making of her a true equal to himself, because he loves her more than he loves his own body. This is the essence of male-female equality!
They wed, move to the suburbs, and he’s got a perky, taut, tanned, toned 19-year-old wife who desires nothing but to nurse his babies on her large, firm breasts!
The first girlfriend dates a string of increasingly undesirable losers, on the principle that the bigger the loser, the more difficult it is for him to get women, so the more likely it is that he’ll hang on to what he has. But none of them do.
By age 35 her eyes are vacant, smoky windows into a heart abandoned and starved. She’s got motivation to levy false rape accusations! She wants vengeance on all men; vengeance on masculinity itself! But it’s her own fault. If she would have remained a virgin until her wedding night, she’d have the guy, not the 19-year-old bikini-contest contestant.
So, in any sane mind, women are usually to blame for being raped. That doesn’t mean all are! They don’t want the guilt, so they try to push it off onto someone else. Males naturally mate females.
If the woman is struggling to break free, muscular activity causes the release of endorphins, which causes the release of dopamine, which is responsible for sensations of joy, peace and love. At the same time her brain sets up a neuralchemical-feedback loop based on oxytocin.
Trust is rewarded by more oxytocin, which brings with it dizzying ecstasy. Fear is punished by less oxytocin, which greatly diminishes the woman’s experience. Through negative feedback, the woman gives herself to trust, which multiplies again her ecstatic sensations.
As her musculature is exhausted from fighting off the man, she resigns herself, and gives herself over—mind, body and soul—to the man in the position of conquest. The neurochemical cascades that occur in the woman cause her to ovulate, greatly increasing her chance of successful mating.
She accept the man’s intimate gift of masculine love and forgiveness—a gift he made himself—deposited through much labor, at the opening to her Fallopian tubes. Normally, the woman is grateful for the man’s initiative and effort. But butt-ugly dikes with their stubby little teeth and bit-off nails, short hairdos and steely little knives deceive girls into lament over what was probably fun for both the girl and the guy.
In the man’s case, by performing the marital act while simultaneously restraining the woman to the position of surrender, great muscular effort is expended, causing the release of endorphins and dopamine. This increases the man’s potency by a factor 4-6x.
The man’s chances of successful mating are thereby greatly increased. As he releases his masculine issue into the woman, he experiences the ultimate fulfillment of masculine domination and rule!
Clearly, when the woman is forced, the chances of successful mating are greatly increased, necessitating the postulate: is this perhaps nature’s intent for human mating: that the woman resist the man, thereby realizing the full reproductive potential in both the man and the woman?